Mauritius established itself as an early mover in virtual asset regulation with the passage of the Virtual Asset and Initial Token Offering Services (VAITOS) Act. The Financial Services Commission now oversees a structured licensing framework covering five categories of Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) activity, each with distinct scope, capital, and operational requirements.

The Five Licence Categories

Class M: Virtual Asset Broker-Dealer: Permits the buying and selling of virtual assets on behalf of clients. Minimum stated capital of USD 200,000 applies, along with robust AML/CFT obligations and client asset segregation requirements.

Class O: Virtual Asset Custodian: Authorises the safekeeping and administration of virtual assets on behalf of clients. This category demands particularly strong cybersecurity infrastructure and operational resilience standards.

Class I: Virtual Asset Investment Adviser: Covers the provision of advice on virtual asset investments. Lighter capital requirements than other categories, but significant conduct of business and disclosure obligations.

Class R: Virtual Asset Roboadvisor: Permits automated or algorithm-driven virtual asset advisory services. Applicants must demonstrate the robustness and explainability of their underlying models.

Class S: Virtual Asset Exchange: The most demanding category, permitting the operation of a platform for the exchange of virtual assets. Requirements include substantial capital, sophisticated technology infrastructure, and comprehensive market surveillance capabilities.

The Application Process

FSC licence applications for VASP activities require a comprehensive business plan, detailed description of the technology infrastructure, AML/CFT programme documentation, proof of minimum capital, fit-and-proper assessments of key personnel, and an opinion from Mauritius-qualified legal counsel.

Timeline from application to grant of licence typically ranges from four to six months for well-prepared applications, though this can vary depending on FSC workload and the complexity of the proposed business model.

What Applicants Often Underestimate

In our experience, the most common delays arise not from the FSC's review process itself, but from inadequate preparation of the AML/CFT programme documentation and insufficient attention to the substance requirements, particularly the requirement for qualified, locally-present compliance personnel.

Aurevya's Virtual Asset practice supports clients through every stage of the VASP licensing process, from initial licence category selection through to FSC approval and post-licence compliance infrastructure.